---
title: "Are SMB SaaS Companies Valued Differently than Mid-Market SaaS Businesses?"
description: "Discover how SMB SaaS companies command 8.1x revenue multiples vs 5.9x for mid-market. New data analysis reveals surprising valuation trends across segments."
categories: ["SaaS","fundraising","startups"]
keywords: ["SMB SaaS valuation","Mid-Market SaaS valuation","Tomasz Tunguz","venture capital","SaaS multiples","fundraising for SaaS","SaaS company growth","enterprise SaaS valuation"]
ai_summary: "SMB SaaS companies are valued higher than Mid-Market ones, but growth and market size are key factors in overall valuation."
date: 2016-09-21
lastmod: 2026-07-30
canonical_url: https://www.tomtunguz.com/customer-segment-multiples/
author: "Tomasz Tunguz"
---

<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/multiple_by_customer_segment.png">![image](https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/multiple_by_customer_segment.png)</a>

Recently, we examined the comparative efficiency of bottoms-up and top-down businesses. Today, we'll dig into valuation metrics to see if there's any systematic bias in the investor community for SMB, Mid-Market and Enterprise SaaS companies. 

Using public data, I categorized the 50 or so public companies by ACV at IPO. SMB is less than $10k, Mid-Market is between $10k and $100k, and Enterprise is greater than $100k in average customer value. 

The data indicates that SMB companies trade on average at 8.1x trailing revenues, Mid-Market at 5.9x, and Enterprise companies at 6.5x. The difference between the Mid-Market and SMB figures are statistically significant at an R^2 of 0.09, but none of the other figures are statistically different. 

<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/acv_multiple_distribution.png">![image](https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/acv_multiple_distribution.png)</a>

The Enterprise data set includes 9 companies so the sample size isn't large enough there to overcome an interesting dynamic of the enterprise market: the bi-modal distribution. There are three Enterprise businesses trading at premium multiples of around 10x trailing, but also 3 that trade at below 3x trailing. 

In the SMB and Mid-Market, there's quite a bit of variance. The SMB market multiples more consistently higher than Mid-Market, echoing the first chart. 

<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/absolute_revenue_by_customer_segment.png">![image](https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/absolute_revenue_by_customer_segment.png)</a>

So, are Mid-Market companies consistently considered less valuable businesses? No. 

The biggest SaaS companies are Mid-Market companies. The chart above shows the distribution of the sample by revenue, and I'm excluding two of the largest SaaS companies as outliers because they skew the chart. 

<a href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/rev_growth_by_segment.png">![image](https://res.cloudinary.com/dzawgnnlr/image/upload/q_auto/f_auto/w_auto/rev_growth_by_segment.png)</a>

These enormous businesses can't sustain the same growth rates as their smaller revenue peers in both SMB and Enterprise, and so they receive a slightly smaller multiple.

Overall, there is no meaningful difference in valuation by customer size. A SaaS startup at scale is going to be valued by its growth, market size, and long term prospects, irrespective of how many customers of what size it acquires.


